May 7, 2013
The Debt Collector Lied I Could Settle My Private Student Loan Debt
The background information is something like this: I went delinquent on a student loan (private) after a period of financial hardship.
It defaulted and went over to NCO Financial for debt collections. I wasn't sure how the whole process worked at the time, and I started a payment plan. My agent at NCO was named John and would call every month after the 15th to get a monthly payment. He seemed cordial enough...I was making regular payments via debit card over the phone. This would prove to be a three year plan (so far) and Jim would occasionally ask me if I could settle and told me that they could do 85% of the amount or they would field an offer.
We discussed this and decided I would make minimum payments to keep my account in good status but set aside money for the lump sum settlement to save money, making an offer for less than the 85% (although that number was never formally approved and I was still paying on the loan and bringing the total amount down).
While in the midst of repayment, Jim leaves the company and I receive a new agent to deal with. My debt was now down to around $4,000 and I continued making payments ($200 a month, I had increased it from $100 on my own terms). When I mention to the new agent, Mia, about the plan Jim and I had worked through, she at first played coy that they ever settle.
After a few months I felt like I was in a place to make a lump sum payment. The debt was now at around $3,600 and I made an offer of $2,800. Over the phone, Mia told me that that was a reasonable offer and they were likely to accept, she just had to take it to original loan lender to see if they would accept.
She said she e-mailed the lender and they had declined my offer because I had been so consistent with the loan payments (nearing two years of consistent monthly payments) and unless I could make a case for pending financial hardship, it was within their interest to keep the monthly payments coming or to accept a counter offer of $3,100.
Now I felt like I was being refused because of good behavior, and that if I was inconsistent they might have felt more so the need to settle early. I also felt like I made a reasonable offer (further encouraged by my NCO agent) and perhaps it'd look more appealing if I went a few months without making a payment.
So a few months go by and I am still in communication with them, but they refuse the offer still. Now they are threatening litigation since I have gone without payments. I decided to do some research (what I should have down before ever making the first payment).
Basically, I heard of collection agencies buying debt for pennies on the dollar, so my first thought was playing hardball, rallying for some unforeseen but lower number closer to the amount they may for paid for my own loan. If they counter with $3,100, I counter even lower than my initial offer and lay off some payments. I still can't believe they would take me to court with an offer on the table at only $300 less than their desired settlement.
I then called up my original lender to see if I could work with them directly. They pulled up my account, verified the amount and date of last payment, and that I was in fact dealing with NCO.
They told me that they never settle for less than the full amount (not even the guaranteed 85% I was told from the beginning) and said that it was completely with NCO to settle the loan for them.
The man I talked to also said that they don't and wouldn't receive my offer to settle like NCO led my to believe, which made me think my agent was actually seeking approval for the settlement with her own manager, who in turn hoped to glean more money from me.
Basically, the lender doesn't meddle once it turns over to NCO...it was up to NCO to collect. And yet it has to be satisfied with the lender, which implies NCO didn't outright purchase my loan, and he also said they themselves wouldn't sue, that would again be NCO.
Interesting that I can't work with them directly and cut out NCO (refusing payment from a borrower!), and at this point, they are implying that by NCO taking anything less than the full amount, they are doing me a favor!
So now I am trying to move forward (without being sued) and I realize that guessing whether or not that is an idle threat is just speculation. I have been researching NCO and their tactics and have even read some horror stories of people settling for a percentage of the whole and that amount not satisfying the loan, or still showing up as something to the effect of "paid but not in full" on credit statements.
Is a monthly payment plan really the only way to go to clear this debt off my back? And to think if they took my offer I would have made another debit card payment over the phone in what amounts to essentially good faith...I still don't think I have any actual documentation from NCO (they even refuse to e-mail me payment receipts, instead insisting to read a confirmation number over the phone).
I guess I'm looking for advice to proceed and pay as little of the full amount as possible, and also get the proper documentation so it can't ever come up again. Part of me thinks my NCO agent is just playing me for being on my side against the lender, but ultimately this just being another lying tactic.
Would a debt collection company really sue you when a settlement is on the table for a few hundred less with $3,600 remaining on the loan? Did my agent let slip that they ultimately would settle for my offer, but perhaps they are holding out for more and initiating scare tactics (litigation)? It is also frustrating because when I called NCO last, they juggled me around operators (first available) who apparently have very bad memory and some who flat our deny the possibility of settling.
I finally asked who my agent was (Mia) and asked that she call me back. That was 5 days ago. How can they threaten litigation for going too long without payment but then go days without returning a phone call to me when I am looking to make traction on the loan?
The above statements do not represent those of Weston Legal or Michael Weston and they have not been reviewed for accuracy. The statements have been published by a third party and are being linked to by our website only because they contain information relating to debt. Nothing in this article should be construed as legal advice given by Weston Legal or Michael Weston. To view the source of the article, please following the link to the website that published the article. Articles written by Michael W. Weston can be viewed here: To report any problem with this article please email firstname.lastname@example.org