May 14, 2013
Supreme Court Ruling in Student Loan Case May Discourage Lawsuits
In a case involving a student loan collections dispute, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling in favor of a debt collector, the ABA Journal reports.
This ruling, which awarded court costs to the debt collector, could potentially send a powerful message to the little guy: Don't sue your debt collector, no matter how much they allegedly harass you.
Consumers are supposedly protected under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The Act prohibits creditors and debt collectors from pursuing a debtor unfairly or using unfair tactics.
A lawsuit was brought by Olivea Marx, a student debtor who claimed that General Revenue Corporation violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by making harassing phone calls and threats to garnish her wages. They even sent a fax to her place of work, Courthouse News Service reports.
Despite these tactics, a trial court found that Marx did not make a strong case and the judge ordered her to pay $4,500 in court costs to General Revenue Corporation.
Marx eventually appealed her case to the U.S. Supreme Court. But last week, the Court sided with the debt collector and upheld the order for Marx to pay $4,500 in court costs.
Marx had argued that the fee-shifting provisions in the law said that she would only have to pay court costs if she'd brought the lawsuit in bad faith.
That argument, however, was shot down by the Court.
Student loans are a huge burden to many Americans. The scary truth about student loans is that they are very tough to pay off and even tougher to get rid of if you can't pay them off. For example, student loans aren't typically dischargeable in bankruptcy.
A student debtor can be subject to a variety of tactics by creditors and still not be in a position to fight back. As this case shows, if a student does fight back against allegedly unfair debt collection practices, she runs the risk of having to pay court costs if she loses her case.
The above statements do not represent those of Weston Legal or Michael Weston and they have not been reviewed for accuracy. The statements have been published by a third party and are being linked to by our website only because they contain information relating to debt. Nothing in this article should be construed as legal advice given by Weston Legal or Michael Weston. To view the source of the article, please following the link to the website that published the article. Articles written by Michael W. Weston can be viewed here: To report any problem with this article please email firstname.lastname@example.org